iramramzan

Just another WordPress.com site…but better

Who represents Muslims? The answer is a resounding – no one

with 2 comments

Originally published for Left Foot Forward on March 25

Who represents, or who speaks for, Muslims? After countless debates and articles dedicated to this question, which is asked every so often (usually on a slow news day), it is posed once again.

On Monday’s Newsnight, Quilliam Foundation’s Maajid Nawaz had just this debate with Huffington Post’s political editor (UK) Mehdi Hasan and Twitter celebrity Mohammed Ansar.

Oxford academic Myriam Francois Cerrah was also supposed to be on the show but was dropped at the last minute for ‘editorial reasons’ in favour of another male (Mohammed Ansar).

What we eventually saw was a group of South Asian Muslim men, aged 30 plus, shouting at each other (because we clearly don’t see enough of those do we?) The result was a tit-for-tat argument that descended into chaos, which left even Jeremy Paxman left looking bewildered.

There is clearly no love lost between Mehdi Hasan and Maajid Nawaz, but the pair wasted an opportunity to come together to have a much needed discourse on the issue of Muslim representation.

Ironically, Myriam Cerrah complained about the all-male panel, claiming it was not representing a diverse range of views but then suggested that ex-Muslims should not be able to speak about Islam.

Far too often, Muslims complain that there is no unity within their communities yet when debates such as the one on Newsnight are aired, they take one side against the other, declare one, or all, participant(s) as non-Muslim, or non representative.

This is a problem we have – as soon as a Muslim, or someone of Muslim heritage, gives an interview, they’re immediately pounced on, attacked, or vilified as not representative or not ‘Muslim enough’. Yet no participant, or writer, who ever speaks about Islam or Muslims purports to be representing everyone.

And, as much as I agree with many of Maajid’s views, even he does not speak for me. I speak for myself, though I understand that there are many people out there whose voices are not represented in the media.

This is why it is important to have a broad range of opinions (and this goes goes for anything, not just Muslims), meaning we cannot just play host to liberal voices. We must allow liberal, conservative, reactionary and even extremist voices, regardless of whether we agree with them or not

This includes people such as Maajid or Mona Eltahawy, Mehdi Hasan, Myriam Cerrah, even the extremist Anjem Choudary and those from groups such as the Islamic Education and Research Academy, who advocate segregation at University lectures, because stifling debate is not the answer.

As soon as you forbid one opinion or one person’s views, you send them underground and make them martyrs for their cause.

So who does does speak for Muslims or Islam? The answer is a resounding – no one. No one can, or should, speak for the 1.6 billion Muslims on the planet, and nor does any one person or organisation represent Islam.

Advertisements

Written by Iram Ramzan

March 30, 2014 at 9:29 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I have to disagree with you Iram, if anybody wasted this opportunity it wasn’t Majid rather it was Mehdi Hasan and Mo Ansar who both ganged up on Majid as the true Islamo fascists that they happen to be – 2 versus 1 does not make a fair debate and if Cerrah had been on she too would have sided with them leaving Majid to fend for himself in a bear pit. These people happen to pretend they have certain modern principles but are really wolves in sheep clothing who are out to destroy any dissenting opinion which does not align with their Nazi like doctrine. For Cerrah to comment that no ex Muslim should be allowed to speak about Islam just shows how far their intolerance is now ingrained in their minds that the indoctrination is complete and yet they cry foul and howl in protest when they feel somehow they are being intolerated against. It seems that the only remit these people have and the values that they aspire to are all negative. They are the cancer that afflicts this society. Wake up people and be on guard for they will devour the unsuspecting. Majid Nawaz is a courageous hero.

    Imrandma

    March 30, 2014 at 10:33 pm

    • I do agree with you, but I didnt want to make this an attack on anyone, I wanted to focus on the question if that makes sense = ]

      Iram Ramzan

      March 31, 2014 at 7:23 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Shiraz Socialist

Because there have to be some lefties with a social life

Forever young.

"Speak now or forever hold your peace in pieces."

The Gerasites

Pro-Democracy; Anti-Totalitarianism.

Futile Democracy

A left-leaning focus on US Politics, UK Politics, World Affairs, and Religion & Secularism

Homo economicus' Weblog

2B3 a Freethinking Space

As Us

A Space for Writers of the World

Six Pillars

North Africa, South and West Asia (Middle East) Arts Platforms

the fatal feminist

Lethal poison for the System.

%d bloggers like this: